Post by BillW on Oct 9, 2015 20:51:39 GMT
No takers from the list but here's the graph and synthetic version.
The confidence in this is low. It was very shallow to the dispersion axis and the transformation for plotting produced a low quality result.
The video showed very rapid defocus below 400nm. The summation gives it the appearence of being better than it really is.
Also some unusual line behaviour over the duration. Pity it didn't have better dispersion properties.
Its at the blue end for a change and it looks pretty if nothing else!
Big lines from left to right, Mg, Fe, Si+ and Mg. other bumps are Fe (possibly!, nothing really fits due to distortions so these were the best guesses...)
cheers,
Bill.
The confidence in this is low. It was very shallow to the dispersion axis and the transformation for plotting produced a low quality result.
The video showed very rapid defocus below 400nm. The summation gives it the appearence of being better than it really is.
Also some unusual line behaviour over the duration. Pity it didn't have better dispersion properties.
Its at the blue end for a change and it looks pretty if nothing else!
Big lines from left to right, Mg, Fe, Si+ and Mg. other bumps are Fe (possibly!, nothing really fits due to distortions so these were the best guesses...)
cheers,
Bill.
